TL;DR
They're more similar than different, but the choice often comes down to your existing tools.
- Choose Slack if: You want the best UX, need lots of integrations, or your team values chat culture
- Choose Teams if: You already use Microsoft 365, need better video conferencing, or want one app for everything
- The honest truth: If your company already pays for Microsoft 365, Teams is hard to justify skipping. If not, Slack is probably better.
Our take: Both work fine. Pick based on your existing ecosystem, not features.
The Core Difference
Here's what it comes down to: Slack was built as a chat tool. Teams was built as Microsoft's answer to Slack.
That origin story shapes everything. Slack feels like a product designed by people who obsess over user experience. Teams feels like a product designed to check every enterprise box and integrate with Office.
Neither is wrongâthey're just optimized for different priorities.
Where Slack Wins
The User Experience Gap Is Real
This is the most consistent feedback from people who've used both: Slack just feels better. The interface is cleaner, navigation is more intuitive, and everything loads faster.
Teams has improved significantly, but there's still a noticeable difference in how polished the experience feels. Little thingsâlike how quickly messages appear, how easy it is to find channels, how threading worksâSlack gets the details right.
Better Third-Party Integrations
Slack has 2,400+ apps in its directory. Teams has fewer, though Microsoft is catching up. More importantly, Slack integrations tend to be more mature and better designed.
If you rely heavily on non-Microsoft tools (Figma, Notion, Asana, GitHub, etc.), Slack's integrations are typically more robust.
Channel Organization
Slack's channel system is more flexible and easier to navigate. Creating, joining, and organizing channels feels natural. Teams' channel structure is tied to its "Teams" hierarchy, which can get confusing.
The Culture Thing
Custom emoji, Giphy, reaction culture, huddlesâSlack has fostered a certain vibe that many teams love. It makes chat feel more human. Teams has these features too, but the culture around them is different.
Where Teams Wins
Microsoft 365 Integration
If your organization lives in Microsoft 365, Teams is hard to beat. Real-time co-editing in Word/Excel/PowerPoint, SharePoint integration, Outlook calendar syncâit all works seamlessly because it's the same ecosystem.
Slack can integrate with Microsoft tools, but it's never as smooth as the native experience.
Video Conferencing
Teams supports 300 participants in video calls. Slack maxes out at 50 (and you need the paid plan for that). Teams' video featuresâbackground blur, breakout rooms, meeting recordings, live captionsâare more mature.
Many organizations use Slack for chat but Teams (or Zoom) for video calls. If you want one app for both, Teams is better.
The Price Argument
If you're already paying for Microsoft 365 Business ($12.50+/user/month), Teams is included. Slack Pro costs $8.75/user/month on top of that.
For a 50-person company, that's an extra $5,250/year to use Slack instead of the Teams you're already paying for. That math matters.
Enterprise & Compliance
Teams has stronger enterprise features out of the boxâeDiscovery, compliance tools, advanced security, government certifications. Slack has these too, but often at higher tiers.
The Problems With Each
Slack's Issues
- Resource hungry: Slack uses 1.5-3GB of RAM. On older machines, it's noticeable.
- Notification burnout: The always-on nature can be exhausting. The red badge becomes stressful.
- Free plan limits: 90-day message history, limited integrations, no group video calls
- Gets expensive: $8.75-15/user/month adds up quickly for larger teams
Teams' Issues
- Clunky interface: Navigation can be confusing. Finding things takes more clicks.
- Slower performance: Teams is also resource-heavy, and the UI can feel sluggish
- Overwhelming features: Microsoft keeps adding features. The app tries to do too much.
- Forced ecosystem: Works great with Microsoft tools, less great with everything else
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Slack | Microsoft Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 90-day history, 10 integrations, 1:1 video | Unlimited chat, 60-min video, 5GB storage |
| Starter/Essentials | $8.75/user/month | $4/user/month |
| Pro/Business Basic | $15/user/month | $6/user/month |
| Business+/Premium | $15/user/month | $12.50/user/month (includes Office apps) |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | $22/user/month (Microsoft 365 E3) |
Note: Teams pricing is often bundled with Microsoft 365, which includes Word, Excel, Outlook, etc. Direct price comparison is tricky because of this bundling.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Slack | Teams |
|---|---|---|
| Max video participants | 50 | 300 |
| App integrations | 2,400+ | 1,000+ |
| Message search (free) | 90 days | Unlimited |
| File storage (free) | 5GB total | 5GB/user |
| Screen sharing | Yes (paid) | Yes (free) |
| Breakout rooms | No | Yes |
| Custom emoji | Yes | Yes |
| Threaded conversations | Excellent | Good |
Who Should Use What
Choose Slack
- Startups and small teams
- Creative/design teams
- Teams using mostly non-Microsoft tools
- Organizations that value UX and chat culture
- Tech companies (it's the default in Silicon Valley)
Choose Teams
- Already paying for Microsoft 365
- Need robust video conferencing
- Enterprise with compliance requirements
- Want one app for chat + video + files
- Budget-conscious (if bundled with M365)
The Alternatives
Don't want either? Here are other options:
- Discord: Free, great for smaller teams, originally for gaming but increasingly used for work
- Google Chat: If you're in Google Workspace, it's included and decent
- Mattermost: Open-source, self-hosted option for security-conscious teams
- Rocket.Chat: Another self-hosted alternative with good features
The Bottom Line
Our Verdict
There's no wrong choice. Both Slack and Teams are capable tools used by millions of people every day.
The decision usually comes down to:
- Are you already paying for Microsoft 365? If yes, try Teams first. It's included.
- Do you care deeply about UX? Slack is more polished.
- Do you need robust video conferencing? Teams is better.
- What does your team already use? Switching costs are real. Don't change for marginal gains.
Our recommendation: Most companies should just use whatever tool fits their existing ecosystem. The productivity difference between them is minimal compared to the switching costs and learning curves of changing platforms.